A Smarter Subscription Experience. I Redesigned Nuts.com’s Management Flow to Give Customers More Control, and Helped Drive a 5% Increase in AOV.

Context

My Role
Lead Product Designer
Project Status
🚀 Launched
Timeline
3 Months
Team
1 Product Manager,
2 Engineers

What I Did

I redesigned Nuts.com’s subscription management experience to make it easier for customers to cancel, skip, and add items to their shipments.

Background

Nuts.com is a DTC snack brand offering over 3,000 products through both one-time purchases and subscriptions. While most revenue comes from one-off orders, subscriptions generate over $10M in recurring revenue annually. Despite their smaller share of revenue, subscriptions were a major source of customer friction.

My Role

As the sole product designer on this 3-month initiative, I led the end-to-end redesign of the subscription platform used by 26K+ active subscribers. I conducted discovery research, defined the product vision, collaborated closely with engineering and support, and led three rounds of usability testing to validate and refine the design before launch.

Problem

The Subscription Management Experience Was Frustrating Users and Hurting Retention.
The Nuts.com subscription system generated significant revenue but didn’t align with how users expected it to work. Each subscribed product operated on its own schedule, making subscriptions hard to manage and prone to error. This friction led to permanent churn, 92% of canceled users never returned to shop with Nuts.com.

Challenge

How might we make subscription management intuitive and flexible, so customers can easily group shipments, qualify for free shipping, and make changes with confidence?
Despite contributing millions in annual recurring revenue, the subscription management experience at Nuts.com was a persistent source of churn and user frustration. Customers struggled to understand how products in shipments were grouped or how to make changes, and customer support consistently flagged it as one of the top drivers of complaints.

Constraints

No A/B testing: All changes had to be rolled out universally, requiring high confidence before launch.
Minimize disruption: The experience had to support existing behaviors and avoid alienating current subscribers.
Back-end limitations: The redesign had to fit within existing systems for shipment grouping and shipping logic, no major engineering overhauls allowed.

Success Metrics

1. Increase Average Order Value (AOV)
2. Improve subscriber retention and overall Lifetime Value (LTV)

Research

I Asked 600+ Customers Why They Canceled Their Subscriptions.

Before starting the subscription management redesign, I conducted discovery research to understand why customers subscribed, what they valued, and what drove them to cancel. This included four surveys across key subscriber segments and 14 in-depth customer interviews. Below are the top three pain points I discovered from that research.

❌ problem #1
Unexpected shipments and extra shipping fees.

It was hard for subscribers to get all their products delivered on the same day. Sometimes, skipping an item once would permanently remove it from the shipment group, which led to unexpected deliveries and extra shipping fees.

❌ problem #2
Poor UX Affordances, Important Actions are Buried, and There is a Lot of Unclear Terminology.

Many loyal and new customers found managing subscriptions to be confusing. Important actions, like “Cancel Product Subscription” were buried in unnoticeable three-dot menus, making them easy to miss. For power users managing large or complex orders, the inability to merge shipments added unnecessary friction and made the process feel tedious. Language throughout the interface also caused confusion. Many users couldn’t confidently tell the difference between “Remove Item from Shipment” and “Cancel Subscription,” leading to accidental changes and frustration.

❌ Problem #3
Limited Ability to Build Baskets and Frustration With the Add Items Flow.

The “Add Items” modal drives 16% of new product subscriptions, but most users miss it, and those who find it can’t search the full catalog to add specific products.

Requirements

Based on my customer research, I synthesized the following key experience and system requirements to guide the redesign:

User Experience

• Make critical actions easy to find
• Reduce surprise fees and shipments, and increase control.
• Encourage value-maximizing behaviors (grouping, shipping threshold).

System Strategy

• Preserve familiar 2-page structure to reduce cognitive overhead.
• Introduce new interaction patterns only where necessary.

Validation

I Planned and Conducted Three Rounds of Usability Testing to Refine the Design from Low-Fidelity Wireframes to the Final Prototype.

Since this redesign couldn’t be A/B tested, I needed to validate it before launch. I ran three rounds of usability testing, starting with internal guerrilla tests on low-fidelity wireframes to validate the design’s structure and core user flows. I then tested high-fidelity wireframes with external users to refine usability, and finally tested the high-fidelity prototype with real subscribers to ensure it was compatible with existing behavior and expectations. This approach gave me actionable feedback at each stage and reduced risk before handoff.
🧪 Round 1:
In-Office Guerrilla Testing (Low-Fi Wireframes)
First, I conducted in-office usability testing with low-fidelity wireframes. These informal sessions helped me quickly validate the design’s basic structure and core interactions.

Version: Interactive Low-Fidelity Mobile Wireframe (Figma)
Method: In-person, rapid testing with co-workers
Participants: 5
🧪 Round 2:
Remote Testing With Userlytics (High-Fi Wireframes)
After synthesizing feedback from the first usability test, I refined the original wireframes and tested them remotely with external participants using the Userlytics platform. This second usability test helped me surface friction points, and evaluate how intuitive the overall structure and core management flows felt to users both familiar and unfamiliar with other subscription programs.

Version: High-fidelity mobile wireframes (Figma)
Method: Remote un-moderated testing via Userlytics
Participants: 6 external users (3 familiar with subscriptions, 3 new to them)
🧪 Round 3 (Final Test):
Validating the Design with Real Nuts.com Subscribers
I conducted a final phase of usability testing with actual Nuts.com subscribers. This round focused on validating the high-fidelity desktop prototype and identifying any remaining usability issues. Insights gathered from these sessions led to final refinements, bringing the design to a launch-ready state.

Prototype: High-fidelity desktop version (Figma)
Method: Moderated remote testing via Google Hangout
Participants: 10 active Nuts.com subscribers

Final Design

✅ New Design – Page 1:
Subscription Overview That Showcases Shipment Groupings
The new subscription portal has a more minimalist “Overview” page shat showcases all the current active Auto-Delivery shipment groupings that a person has set up. The purpose of this page is to show customers how many different shipment boxes they are subscribed to.
✅ New Design – Page 2:
Subscription Shipment Details
The new shipment details page brings the “Add items” button to the top of the page, to increase discoverability. It now includes the ability to assign shipments names, and it makes the “Cancel subscription” button easier to find by locating it behind a button named “Manage” instead of a 3 dot icon.
✅ New Feature 1:
Easily Search for and Add New Products
Prior to the re-design, 16% of new subscriptions were activated using functionality within the portal but the only way to add products in the portal was with an upsell modal with no search functionality. The new portal includes a search bar to make it easy.
✅ New Feature 2:
Move Products Between Shipments
Previously you wouldn’t be able to move individual products between subscription bundles. This was the source of a lot of frustration for customers who wanted to move an individual item to a different shipment but couldn’t. The new design allows customers to move products between shipments.
✅ New Feature 3:
Keep 'Skipped' Products Attached to Shipment
In the previous portal design, when a product was “skipped once” from a shipment it could become permanently decoupled. When products are “Skipped” in the new design, they will no longer become decoupled from their original shipment.

New Components

Components I Built for This New Design

Because I was doing a total redesign of the subscription portal, almost all sections of the page required me to create new components, except for small elements like quantity adjusters and text boxes most elements on the page are new.

Developer Handoff

The Final Touches

With the final design complete, I prepared detailed developer notes, including:
• Breakpoint specifications for responsive design.
• Skeleton load states for smoother transitions.
• Detailed implementation notes and logic

Final Results

New Design Boosts Subscriber AOV by 5%

The new subscription management experience launched on June 20, 2025. While not A/B tested, the design was validated through extensive user research and usability testing. Early metrics show a 5% lift in average order value (AOV) among subscribers.

Reach:
• 26.4K subscribers
• $200K in weekly recurring revenue
• $10M+ ARR

Reflection

Reflecting on My Journey to Redesign the Subscription Portal, I Learned:

👥 Prioritizing the needs of our most loyal subscribers, those who order frequently and retain over time, helped ensure the redesign supported the behaviors and expectations that drive the most business value

✅ Usability testing became significantly more critical in the absence of A/B testing, making it essential to define the highest-risk flows and validate them directly with real subscribers

⚖️ Some trade-offs, like simplifying out-of-stock backup options or delaying advanced upsell features, were necessary to ensure we launched a stable, clear experience that wouldn’t alienate existing users

🤝 Collaborating closely with marketing and support teams helped align how we promoted the new portal with what subscribers actually valued, based on firsthand research